top of page

RELEVANT CONTEXTUAL RESEARCH

 

This page will document the contexts which I have gathered which are relevant to my research and the exploration of the critical discourses that inform my ideas. 

 

Tim Ingold, Making: Drawing the Line

0415567238.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_SX500_.jpg

Ingold, T., 2019. Making. Milano: Raffaello Cortina

In Tim Ingold’s Making: Drawing the Line, he talks about the haptic experience that is inherent within gestural lines. This chapter is very important for informing my own thinking about the role of touch in drawing. He argues that every hand drawn line is the “trace of a gesture” and expressive of the movements that generated them. He goes on to mention that drawing is a more holistic experience that refers to haptic physical memory. You follow through the artists hand the traces left by the artist. This expression of movement also goes hand in hand with the expression of time and gives drawings its unique power of ephemerality, the gesture being indicative of a tentative journey of decision mixed with chance. In my own practice you can likewise see through a haptic engagement with surface, the gestures that are made through the movement of rubbing. Pressing down on the surface of the paper creates gestural marks in the forms of cracks, tears and the production of sculptural depressions that are records of the process of observation and understanding through touch. You can see through the gesture the expressiveness of curiosity in what is rubbed more carefully and what is rubbed less so. Ingold goes onto quote Derrida who talks about the hand of the writer: 

“it feels its way, it gropes, it caresses as much as it inscribes...as if a lidless eye had opened at the tip of the fingers”.  

This really resonates with me, as in my own drawing I also hope to seek and understand, tentatively and sensitively exploring through touch. There are many aspects to Ingold’s research which I hope to think about further.

A History of Rubbing of and Touch

 

I started to think more about the history of rubbing and touch and how this might inform what I was making. I researched more into how it relates to human beings both past and present and universally. Rubbing is a primal urge that imparts endearment and a physical bond with things in our environment. The handshake, which after all is rubbing your hands with someone else's, in all its multifaceted forms is a physical bond between two friends that is distinct from verbal or visual forms of the same intention. We rub our lovers to feel an intimate connection. All mammals rub themselves against things and each other for comfort. Rubbing is an enjoyable and positive thing that connects all of us. It provides a unique physical relationship with each other and the things in our environment. 

The Mecca Stone, black from the myriad of hands who have caressed it to show their devotion.

Rubbing has historically been associated with acts of devotion and is a way of imparting love and value into things. The Mecha stone has been turned black from so many hands rubbing it in pilgrimage over the centuries. Holy relics, such as the portion of the cross, are there to be rubbed and show your love and care for God. In more recent times the idea of polishing has been seen as a way of imparting value. Polishing silver, brass or even varnishing of wood is seen as imparting worth into objects. In my own iteration of rubbings, I can feel this connection with the object that I am delicately caressing, trying to form a relationship and understanding of the emotional connection I feel with things in my world. Almost like an act of devotion, the laborious act of rubbing gives meaning and value to the thing rubbed. I cannot help but feel the abstracted notion of religious thought being given life through relics and the things we make to furnish this idea of God, also in a similar way gives life to the objects of devotion. By putting all this attention and meaning into the objects I rub I am in essence giving them an animus of their own. 

The idea of polishing silver is interesting when thinking about the aesthetic qualities of own work. It is the idea of making something shiny, and valuable that ties into the use of graphite in my rubbings. If you look at an artist such as Alan Mcgee, who in the work Wooden House Hold Objects And Graphite (2012), transfigures objects in his kitchen into graphite iterations, you can see he imparts value through making things shiny. This is also turning the notions of what we think is valuable and meaningful on its head in a playful way.

image3-35.jpg

Diogo Pimentao, Walk, 2015 Paper and graphite 101x21x120cm

The Thinking Hand, Juhani Pallasmaa

107970.jpg

The exhibition I went to in the winter at Patrick Heidi Contemporary Gallery, new forces knocking (2021), had a graphite sculpture that also had this notion of value through a shiny graphite surface. I want to reflect more on Rubbing history and how it informs my practice, and this idea of value is something I wish to research further.

Juhani Pallasmaa (2009). The thinking hand existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. Chichester Wiley. 

The Thinking Hand is a book written by Juhani Pellasmaa, which champions a reconnection with our senses, especially touch, in the wake of an ever-increasing proliferation of digital methods in the creative arts. He touches on the discourses around vision, and how visions superiority over the other senses, in terms of accessing the world, is being challenged. Juhani goes on to discuss embodied experience though the lens of the hand. For him, the hand is not just a passive tool, shaped by the intentions of the brain. Instead, the hand has its own “intentionality, knowledge and skills”. He wishes to emphasize the autonomous and unconscious processes of thinking and making, that is grounded in an awareness of an embodied experience. It is relevant to me that he thinks about the hand and the hands’ use as being an extension of oneself, and even more so when he talks about the lack of separation that exists between the hand, thinking and the things in our environment which hands use. He posits that the act of thinking and hand use are indistinguishable, and that the hand is far from the slavish instrument of the brain. Instead, there forms a relationship with a tool, where the tool becomes an extension of the hand and in essence the hand becomes the tool. This is similarly the case with the pencil and the brush, both becoming inseparable extensions of the hand and the mind. This is very important to me when thinking about discovering the world through touch.  When I use the pencil to make rubbings the pencil becomes an extension of my hand. When I caress the surface of the object to be rubbed rather than rubbing it with my pencil my body and my hands are the pencil. I plan to ponder further on the ramifications of these ideas in unit 3.

Foot Notes

  1. https://janeeaton1947.wordpress.com/frottage/

  2. Chorpening, K. and Fortnum, R. (2020). A companion to contemporary drawing. Hoboken, Nj Wiley-Blackwell.

  3. Ingold, T. (2013). Making : anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Milton Park: Abingdon, Oxon.

  4. Juhani Pallasmaa (2009). The thinking hand existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. Chichester Wiley. 

bottom of page